AtlasLSAT Forums - Digest

Re: PT20, S1, Q22 - To hold criminals responsible

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:48:14 GMT

PrepTest 20 - October 1996 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Replies : Post subject : Re: PT20, S1, Q22 - To hold criminals responsible hey, i'm still really confused on this quest. I don't understand how it contradicts. it seems that they go together. law-abiding people create the environment that is responsible. could you clear this up? more ... Statistics : 3 Replies || 233 Views Last post by daisy_dolly2002

PT37 S1 Q22-26

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:15:54 GMT

PrepTest 37 - June 2002 LSAT - Answers & Explanations - RC

Post subject : PT37 S1 Q22-26 Can you please go over this passage? I'm having trouble understanding this passage. Thank you. more ... Statistics : 1 Post || 3 Views Post by sunhwa2881

PT 36, S3, Q25 Anthropologist: All music is based on a few

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:47:09 GMT

PrepTest 36 - December 2001 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Post subject : PT 36, S3, Q25 Anthropologist: All music is based on a few Can you please offer analysis of the core, and how to approach correct answer in this question? I came up with the following: If PMS (popularity of a music scale) were a result of SC ... more ... Statistics : 1 Post || 6 Views Post by debbie.d.park

Re: PT45, S1, Q7 - An artificial hormone

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:36:17 GMT

PrepTest 45 - December 2004 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Replies : Post subject : Re: PT45, S1, Q7 - An artificial hormone First of all, the answer is (B), which is very close to the answer that you chose. 1. (D) is close but ultimately falls short for two reasons: no analogous case is cited, and implementation is not ... more ... Statistics : 2 Post || 56 Views Last post by bbirdwell

Re: PT 22 S4 Q20 - it would be wrong to conclude that a person

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:30:02 GMT

PrepTest 22 - June 1997 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Replies : Post subject : Re: PT 22 S4 Q20 - it would be wrong to conclude that a person A sharp translation of the argument will be a big help for this one. C: If no evidence other than presence of bacteria --> wrong to conclude infection p: if ... more ... Statistics : 2 Post || 38 Views Last post by bbirdwell

PT31 S4 Q28

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:28:30 GMT

PrepTest 31 - June 2000 LSAT - Answers & Explanations - RC

Post subject : PT31 S4 Q28 Could anyone explain the logic behind choosing correct answer choice (E)? I keep leaning toward (B), because the example in the passage says "investigation into the authority of the texts" is necessary, and that seems to align with investigation into the validity of the ... more ... Statistics : 1 Post || 9 Views Post by rsm133

PT40, S2, Q22 Repressors-people who unconsciously inhibit

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:11:43 GMT

PrepTest 40 - June 2003 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Post subject : PT40, S2, Q22 Repressors-people who unconsciously inhibit I am completely stuck on this. I have no idea why the answer is (A). Anyone can help me sort through the logic in this? Thanks! more ... Statistics : 1 Post || 14 Views Post by c.s.sun5

Re: PT29 S1 Q18; Some planning committee members...

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:58:16 GMT

PrepTest 29 - October 1999 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Replies : Post subject : Re: PT29 S1 Q18; Some planning committee members... As usual, the best idea is to get a good grasp of the argument before going to the choices. 1. some members ---> financial interest 2. member --> ~live suburbs 3. many members ---> work suburbs Take ... more ... Statistics : 2 Post || 29 Views Last post by bbirdwell

Re: PT 51, S3, Q5; The area of mathematics called "gauge field..

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:43:10 GMT

PrepTest 51 - December 2006 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Replies : Post subject : Re: PT 51, S3, Q5; The area of mathematics called "gauge field.. (C) is wrong because it's unsupported. Who's to say whether modern physics discoveries would have been IMPOSSIBLE without those advances? Also, on a nit-picky level, we don't have any evidence to suggest that ... more ... Statistics : 2 Post || 81 Views Last post by bbirdwell

PT 51, S1, Q5; Landscape architect....

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:34:48 GMT

PrepTest 51 - December 2006 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Post subject : PT 51, S1, Q5; Landscape architect....

Quote:

Can you help me understand the reason why C is wrong? Thanks!

One great strategy on problems like this is to boil them down to conditional logic and just use x's and y's rather than the real elements of the argument. ... more ... Statistics : 1 Post || 10 Views Post by bbirdwell

PT49, S3, P3 - Q20

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:31:21 GMT

PrepTest 49 - June 2006 LSAT Answers & Explanations - RC

Post subject : PT49, S3, P3 - Q20 Hello, I have trouble figuring out why (c) is the correct anwer, where I think (d) seems to be a better answer over (c). In line 13-15, it talks about Francesca 's licensure to practice general medicine, which seems to be opposite ... more ... Statistics : 1 Post || 16 Views Post by shinyi0509

Pt6 S3 Q17 Samples from the floors of a rock shelter in Penn

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:54:41 GMT

PrepTest 6 - October 1992 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Post subject : Pt6 S3 Q17 Samples from the floors of a rock shelter in Penn Let's see if I understand answer A's argument correctly: Since there is no likely mechanism of contamination that permits contaminating only the deeper samples, if the samples are contaminated at all, they would all ... more ... Statistics : 1 Post || 19 Views Post by lichenrachel

PT6 S2 Q20 Freedom of speech is not only a basic

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:41:27 GMT

PrepTest 6 - October 1992 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Post subject : PT6 S2 Q20 Freedom of speech is not only a basic Answer C states "a coupling of moral ideals with self-interest". What part in the argument refers to self-interest? more ... Statistics : 1 Post || 19 Views Post by lichenrachel

Re: June 07, S3, Q12 Novel X and Novel Y are both

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:14:29 GMT

June 2007 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Replies : Post subject : Re: June 07, S3, Q12 Novel X and Novel Y are both Hi , Regarding the answer choice (E), could anyone explain why it is a cause/effect relationship rather than the conditional reasoning ? Thanks. more ... Statistics : 2 Post || 43 Views Last post by b91302310

Re: June 07, S3, Q19 Editor: Many candidates say that if elected

Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:50:49 GMT

June 2007 LSAT Answers & Explanations - LR

Replies : Post subject : Re: June 07, S3, Q19 Editor: Many candidates say that if elected Hello, In solving this question, as the conclusion is to disapprove the first sentence in the stimulus, I was trying to find the answer which could weaken the first sentence in order to ... more ... Statistics : 2 Post || 56 Views Last post by b91302310